Důležité informační zdroje PP - seznam

1. Ackermann-Liebrich U, Voegeli T, Gunter-Witt K, Kunz I, Zullig M, Schindler C, et al. Home versus hospital deliveries: follow up study of matched pairs for procedures and outcome. Zurich Study Team. BMJ 1996; 313: 1313-8

2. Acton, K: The birth centre model: as good as it gets?  British Journal of Midwifery Oct. 2007, Vol. 15 Issue 10, p. 602

3. Bastian H., Keirse M.J.N.C, Paul A L Lancaster P.A.L.: Perinatal death associated with planned home birth in Australia: population based study. BMJ 1998; vol. 317:384–8

4. Chamberlain G, Wraight A, Crowley P.: Birth at home. Pract Midwife. 1999, Jul-Aug, 2(7), 35-9.

5. Ekele, B. A.; Tunau, K. A.: Place of delivery among women who had antenatal care in a teaching hospital.   Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, May 2007, Vol. 86 Issue 5, pp. 627-630,

6. Gosline, A.: Extreme childbirth. New Scientist; 2007, 193, 2585, p. 40-43

7. Hildingsson I. Waldenström U., Radestad , I.: Swedish Women’s Interest in Home Birth and In-Hospital Birth Center Care.Birth. Issues in Perinatal Care; Mar. 2003, Vol. 30 Issue 1, p.11-22

8. Islam, M. Ataharul; Chowdhury, Rafiqul I.; Akhter, Halida H.: Complications During Pregnancy, Delivery, and Postnatal Stages and Place of Delivery in Rural Bangladesh.  Health Care for Women International, Oct. 2006, Vol. 27 Issue 9, p807-821

9. Johnson K. C., Daviss B. A.: Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America. BMJ 2005; 330: pp. 1416 - 1422

10. Ladfors L.,Eriksson M.,  Mattson L.A., Kyleba C. K.,  Magnusson L., Milsom I.: A population based study of Swedish women’s opinions about antenatal, delivery and postpartum care. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001; 80: pp. 130–136

11. Longworth, L.; Ratcliffe, J.; Boulton, M.: Investigating women’s preferences for intrapartum care: home versus hospital births.   Health & Social Care in the Community, Nov. 2001, Vol. 9, Issue 6, p. 404-413

12. Maimbolwa M. C., Yamba B., Diwan V., Ransjö-Arvidson A.: Cultural childbirth practices and beliefs in Zambia. Journal of Advanced Nursing; Aug. 2003, Vol. 43 Issue 3, pp. 263-274

13. Mayor, S.: NICE recommends women should choose where to give birth after discussing the risks.  BMJ: British Medical Journal, 3/31/2007, Vol. 334 Issue 7295, pp. 654-654,

14. Olsen O. Meta-analysis of the safety of home birth. Birth 1997;24:4-16.

15. Pang J. W.Y., Heffelfinger J. D.  Huang G. J., Benedetti TJ., Weiss, N. S.: Outcomes of planned home births in Washington State: 1989–1996. Obstetrics & Gynecology; Aug. 2002, Vol. 100 Issue 2, pp. 253 - 259

16. Ronsmans, C.; Etard, J. F.; Walraven, G.; Høj, L.; Dumont, A.; Bernis, L.; Kodio, B.: Maternal mortality and access to obstetric services in West Africa.  Tropical Medicine & International Health, Oct2003, Vol. 8 Issue 10, pp. 940-948,

17. Shaw, R., Kitzinger, C. : Calls to a home birth helpline:Empowermwnt in childbirth. Social Science and medicine; Dec. 2005, vol. 61, 11, pp. 2374 – 2383

18. Schramm, W.F.,  Barnes, D.E.,  Bakwell, J.M..: Neonatal Mortality in Missouri Home Births, 1978-84. American Journal of Public Health   August 1987, Vol, 77, No, 8, pp. 930 - 935

19. van der Hulst, A. M. L.: Dutch midwives: relational care and birth location.Health & Social Care in the Community, Jul 1999, Vol. 7 Issue 4, pp. 242-247

20. van Teijlingen E.R. & van der Hulst L.A.M.: Midwifery in The Netherlands: more than a semi-profession? In: J. Johnson et al. (eds). Health Professions and the State in Europe, Routledge, London 1996, pp. 178 - 186.

21 . World Health Organisation, Appropriate Technologies for Birth. Lancet, 1985, 2 436-37.

22. World Health Organisation, Care in Normal Birth. WHO / FRH / MSM, 1997, 96.24.

23. World Health Organisation, European Strategy for Midwifery Education. 2001.

24. World Health Organisation, Managing complications in pregnancy and childbirth, guide for midwives and doctors. Geneve 2003.